Niagara Falls

I’ve been to Niagara Falls once in my life– way back in 1993. I don’t remember a lot about the falls themselves, but I do remember a cool museum that told of all the stories of people who went over the falls and survived. Very interesting. Anyway, here’s a list of the first 10 people to go over and survive, and the methods in which they used.

  1.  Annie Edson Taylor, USA, Wooden Barrel, 10/24/1901
  2. Bobby Leach, UK, Steel Barrel, 7/25/1911
  3. Jean Lussier, Canada, Steel and Rubber Ball, 4/4/1928
  4. Nathan Boya, USA, Steel and Rubber Ball, 4/15/1961
  5. Karel Soucek, Canada, Wood and Plastic Barrel, 4/3/1984
  6. Steven Trotter, Metal Barrel and Inner tubes, 8/18/1985
  7. Dave Munday, Canada, Steel Container, 9/28/1989
  8. Peter deBernardi, Canada, Steel Container, 9/28/1989
  9. Jeffrey Petkovich, Canada, Steel Container, 9/18/1989
  10. Dave Munday, Canada, Steel Diving Bell, 9/26/1993

Interesting was the long gap between 1928 and 1961. Equally as interesting would be a list of all the unsuccessful trips over the falls. But that’s a bit morbid so I’ll leave that up for someone else to write about. Here’s a picture of Dave Munday’s steel barrel in which he first went over in 1989.

Dave Mundy's Niagara Falls Barrel

 

I guess we really do live in a pop culture world. I just finished researching keyword phrases that start with the words “who won” and was a little surprised at the phrases that folks are searching for these days. I wasn’t completely surprised about the relative search volumes of some of the below phrases but was somewhat befuddled about some of the actual phrases. I wouldn’t  have thought that very many people would have to search for the answer to who won the Civil War. But then again, maybe I am being a bit short-sighted and should realize that some of these searches are being done from countries all over the world. Or maybe there are a few hundred knuckleheads in places like Earle, New Jersey or Muscle Shoals, Alabama who really don’t know who won.

Anyway, below are some of the more interesting search strings that begin with the words “who won” and their approximate number of searches a day.

  1. Who won the most Oscars during his career? 1,100 daily searches
  2. Who won the next Food Network Star? 980 daily searches
  3. Who won American Idol tonight? 810 daily searches
  4. Who won the Revolutionary War? 690 daily searches
  5. Who won Dancing with the Stars? 640 daily searches
  6. Who won the Civil War? 440 daily searches
  7. Who won Flavor of Love? 46 daily searches

Here’s an amazing discovery. Out of the top 50 search strings that begin with the words “who won,” 41 of them that were asking about who won on a reality show. The nine that weren’t about some reality show were asking who won a war (or Civil War battle), a super bowl or an election. I’m really not sure what this says about our society. Would I be naive to think that most people know who won our major wars and don’t need to look for that answer? And people pay less attention to reality TV and thus have to search for who won (because they didn’t care enough to watch)? Or is it simply that more people are interested in who got voted off the Biggest Loser than are interested in knowing about our country’s history. I’m sure it’s a combination of both these, but either way, I’m not sure what to think about the results in this little piece of research. What do you think?

Note: I did this research on February 22, 2009, which happened to be the night of the 81st Annual Academy Awards (Oscars) so the results are a bit skewed with that taking the top spot. On any other day of the year this probably gets searched for much less.

 

falling catOkay, how many of us have heard of a cat surviving a fall from hundreds of feet? Every once in a while a news story will pop up telling of some skyscraper-dwelling cat that amazingly walked away after some kid threw it over the balcony. (Or maybe it just fell.) But have you ever wondered exactly how the cat survived?

The answer is actually an interesting study in physics. If you recall, the acceleration of a falling body (gravity) is 9.8 meters per second squared, or 32 feet per second squared. A quick conversion tells us that a falling mass is increasing its speed about 22 miles per hour for every second it falls. So a cat (assuming he started at zero mph when he fell off the balcony) will be traveling about 22 mph after one second, 44 mph after two seconds, 66 mph after three seconds, etc, etc.  But… any falling mass in the Earth’s atmosphere will reach a terminal velocity (Vt) depending on its weight, mass and shape. Its shape will determine air resistance, hence, a spherical cat will have a higher terminal velocity than a rectangular one.

Well, since there are no spherical or rectangular cats, we have to estimate this terminal velocity for cats. I just read that an actual cat’s Vt is about 60 mph. I guess a group of rogue scientists calculated this by throwing a few cats off a building and timing their descent until they hit the ground. Or maybe they’re just estimating.

So why is a cat’s terminal velocity only 60 mph whereas a fat human’s would be about 120 mph? The answer here is more of a study in biology than physics. A cat has a very sophisticated inner ear and sense of balance. That’s why they usually land on their feet after a fall. But this same sense that innately tells a cat that it’s falling also tells it that it is accelerating — and then when it’s stopped accelerating (reached its Vt). When this happens, a cat will flatten itself out, thus creating a much higher air drag (almost like a parachute or flying squirrel). Then it’s velocity will actually decrease to such a speed that may allow it to survive the fall.

I think this has been proven (or hypothesized) by studies after the fact from vets in big cities reporting incidents of falling cats surviving. An interesting result is that falling cats have a 10% chance of being killed in falls from two to six stories but their chances of survival are increased twofold when falling from 7-32 stories. I don’t think there has been enough data collected from cats falling more than 32 stories to be statistically significant.

And so it goes.

© 2012 mattoneal.com Suffusion theme by Sayontan Sinha